Why Conewago Township's Data Center Plans Face Backlash

The signs went up quietly at first — yard placards and hand-painted plywood staked along rural roads in Conewago Township, Pennsylvania. Then came the community meetings, the petitions, the organizing. Residents who probably never expected to spend their evenings debating megawatt loads and cooling tower water consumption suddenly found themselves deep in the weeds of zoning law and power grid infrastructure.

This is happening everywhere data center developers are pushing into smaller markets. But Conewago Township's situation cuts to the heart of a tension that the industry hasn't figured out how to manage: the communities best suited for data centers — affordable land, available power corridors, lower density — are often the least prepared for what that development actually brings.

Understanding the Data Center Boom

To understand why a developer is eyeing a township in York County, Pennsylvania, you have to understand the math driving site selection right now.

Hyperscale data center demand is growing at a pace the industry itself is struggling to keep up with. Generative AI workloads, cloud expansion, and the explosion of streaming and real-time data processing have pushed power demand projections to levels that would have seemed implausible five years ago. Goldman Sachs estimated that data centers could account for 8% of U.S. electricity consumption by 2030, up from roughly 3% today. That's not incremental growth — that's a structural shift in how the grid gets used.

The result is a land rush. Northern Virginia, the historic center of data center development, is increasingly land-constrained, power-constrained, and politically complicated. Developers are spreading out — into the Southeast, the Midwest, and yes, into secondary markets in the Mid-Atlantic like central Pennsylvania. Conewago Township didn't end up on a developer's shortlist by accident; it ended up there because the calculus of site selection made it attractive.

For local governments, that attraction can feel like a compliment and a threat at the same time.

The Conewago Township Situation

The proposed development near Conewago Township represents a pattern playing out across rural and semi-rural America: a developer identifies a parcel, initiates zoning conversations, and the community discovers — sometimes only after permits are already in motion — that their township is being considered as the next data center corridor.

What's notable about the Conewago situation is how quickly and vocally residents organized. The yard signs visible around the township aren't a fringe reaction. They represent a community that looked at what data center development has meant elsewhere and decided they'd rather ask hard questions now than deal with consequences later.

That instinct isn't wrong. Communities that engage early in the approval process have consistently extracted better outcomes — on buffers, on utility commitments, on traffic mitigation — than those that show up after ground breaks.

The developer's interest in the area makes geographic sense. Central Pennsylvania offers relatively affordable agricultural land, proximity to major fiber routes connecting Philadelphia and Pittsburgh corridors, and access to transmission infrastructure that many truly rural areas lack. For a data center operator, that's a compelling combination.

What Residents Actually Fear

The opposition to data center development at the local level rarely comes down to one issue. It's an accumulation of concerns that individually might be manageable, but together feel like a fundamental change to how a place works.

Environmental Impact

Water consumption is the issue most residents don't expect to care about until someone explains the numbers. A large hyperscale data center can consume millions of gallons of water annually for cooling — some estimates put a single large facility's consumption comparable to that of a small city. In areas with agricultural roots, where water rights and aquifer health matter to livelihoods, that's not an abstract concern.

There's also the question of impervious surfaces, stormwater runoff, and the cumulative impact of clearing large parcels of land. Townships in Pennsylvania are governed by stringent stormwater regulations, but residents are right to wonder whether those regulations were written with 500,000-square-foot server buildings in mind.

Power Infrastructure and Grid Strain

Data centers don't just use electricity — they reshape how it flows. A single large facility might require 100 to 500+ megawatts of dedicated capacity, which can mean new transmission lines, upgraded substations, and agreements with utilities that affect rate structures for every other customer on the grid. When a township-sized power draw gets added to a regional grid, neighboring communities don't always understand they're part of the equation until the rate increases show up on their bills.

Traffic and the Rural Character Question

Heavy construction traffic during a multi-year build-out is a legitimate disruption. So is the permanent presence of delivery vehicles, maintenance crews, and emergency response considerations for facilities that operate around the clock. For residents of a township that chose rural Pennsylvania precisely because it isn't a suburban corridor, these changes aren't minor inconveniences — they're the thing they moved there to avoid.

Balancing Development With Community Needs

Opposition doesn't have to mean rejection. Some of the most contentious data center proposals in the country have eventually produced agreements that gave communities real protections in exchange for approval.

Prince William County, Virginia — which has gone through years of heated debate over its "digital gateway" corridor — is an instructive case. The county ultimately established a designated data center overlay district, concentrating development in specific zones while protecting adjacent agricultural and residential areas. It's not a perfect solution, and the debate continues, but it demonstrates that zoning tools can be used proactively rather than reactively.

In Ohio, some data center developers have negotiated community benefit agreements that include local hiring commitments, contributions to school districts, and infrastructure investments that outlast the construction phase. These agreements work best when community groups organize early enough to have real leverage — not after a project is fully approved.

The fundamental bargaining chip communities have is approval. Once that's granted, negotiating power drops sharply.

For Conewago Township, the window to shape any development — rather than simply accept or reject it — is now. What residents put on the record during the public comment and zoning review process will determine what conditions, if any, get attached to any eventual permits.

Data Centers and Local Governance: What Comes Next

Pennsylvania doesn't have a statewide framework for data center siting the way some states have begun developing for other major infrastructure categories. That leaves townships largely on their own to navigate proposals that have significant regional implications. Local zoning boards aren't typically staffed or resourced to evaluate the grid impact of a 200-megawatt facility or to negotiate with a developer whose legal team has done this dozens of times.

That asymmetry is a systemic problem. Some townships have addressed it by hiring outside consultants — land use attorneys, grid engineers, environmental specialists — specifically to advise them during the review process. That costs money, but it's often recoverable through developer-funded escrow accounts tied to the application process.

What the Conewago situation illustrates, more than anything, is that data center community backlash is really a failure of process before it's a failure of development. When residents first learn about a project from yard signs rather than a township newsletter, trust is already gone. Developers who are serious about operating in a community for 20 to 30 years should have a stronger incentive to change that dynamic than most currently demonstrate.

The communities that will navigate this era of infrastructure expansion most successfully aren't the ones that block every project or approve every project. They're the ones that build the institutional knowledge and the regulatory frameworks to evaluate each proposal on its actual merits — and to negotiate from a position of information rather than anxiety.

Conewago Township residents staking signs in their yards are doing something more valuable than it might appear. They're buying time. Whether the township uses that time wisely depends on what happens next.

Explore more about the InfraSale Marketplace here.

[INTERNAL LINK: data center development]

[INTERNAL LINK: community engagement]

[INTERNAL LINK: zoning regulations]