Is Your Area Ready for 18 New Data Centers?

Archbald, Pennsylvania, isn't typically mentioned in discussions about hyperscale infrastructure, but that may soon change. A developer has submitted a conditional use application proposing to build up to 18 data centers in the borough—a project that, if approved, would represent one of the most significant infrastructure investments in northeastern Pennsylvania in recent memory.

The Archbald Borough Council has scheduled a special meeting to consider the application, signaling that local officials are taking the proposal seriously. The scale alone demands attention: 18 facilities don't describe a modest tech campus; they describe a campus ecosystem—the kind of concentrated digital infrastructure investment that reshapes regions, not just zip codes.

What's Actually Being Proposed

Details from the conditional use application are still emerging, but the structure of the proposal tells its own story. A conditional use application means the developer isn't asking for a blank check—they're working within the borough's zoning framework, seeking approval for a land use that's permitted under specific conditions. That's a meaningful distinction. It suggests the groundwork for this type of development already exists in Archbald's zoning code, and the developer has done enough homework to pursue the formal channel.

Eighteen data centers built in phases over time is a fundamentally different animal than a single large facility—it implies a long-term, committed capital deployment strategy.

Data center campuses of this scale typically represent billions of dollars in capital expenditure when fully built out. For context, a single hyperscale data center can run anywhere from $500 million to over $1 billion, depending on capacity and power infrastructure. Even a more modest multi-facility campus with 18 buildings suggests a developer with serious backing and a long runway.

The Economic Case — And Why It's More Complex Than Headlines Suggest

The headline number that will dominate local conversation is jobs. Data centers always generate jobs-based economic arguments, and those arguments are partially true and partially misleading—and understanding the difference matters for Archbald residents trying to form an informed opinion.

Construction is where the immediate, large-scale employment happens. A project of this magnitude could sustain thousands of construction jobs across multiple years of phased development. These are real, well-paying positions—electricians, ironworkers, HVAC specialists, civil engineers—that inject money directly into the local economy and regional supply chains.

Permanent operational jobs are a different story. A fully operational data center is a highly automated facility. A campus that might cost $2 billion to build could employ fewer than 100 full-time workers once operational. That's not a knock on data centers—it's just the nature of the asset class. The real long-term economic value for Archbald comes not from headcount, but from tax base expansion, utility revenue, and the supply chain ecosystem that tends to grow around major infrastructure.

Local businesses—contractors, restaurants, hotels, suppliers—stand to benefit substantially during construction phases. The question local officials should be asking is how to structure any development agreements to maximize local procurement and capture as much of that spending within the borough as possible.

Infrastructure: The Honest Conversation

This is where the real complexity lies, and it's worth being direct about it. Archbald is a borough of roughly 8,000 residents. Its roads, utilities, and water and sewer systems were not designed around the operational footprint of 18 industrial-scale data centers.

Data centers are extraordinary power consumers. A single large facility can draw 50 to 100 megawatts of power—the equivalent of powering tens of thousands of homes. Eighteen facilities, even smaller-scale ones, could collectively demand hundreds of megawatts from the regional grid. That means PPL or whatever utility serves the area would need to conduct serious transmission capacity studies before the first server rack goes live.

Water is another pressure point. Many data centers use evaporative cooling systems that consume millions of gallons of water annually. In a borough with existing municipal water infrastructure, that demand has to be modeled carefully.

The infrastructure readiness question isn't whether Archbald can handle 18 data centers today—it's whether the developer is prepared to fund the upgrades required to make it possible.

That's the negotiation that happens in conditional use proceedings, and it's why those public meetings matter. Roads will need assessment for heavy construction traffic. Fiber connectivity infrastructure will need to be in place or planned. Emergency services capacity—fire, specifically, given the electrical risk profile of data center facilities—deserves scrutiny.

None of these are disqualifying obstacles. They're engineering and financing problems, and those have solutions. But communities that don't ask hard questions upfront tend to discover the costs later, often after the leverage to negotiate has disappeared.

The Public Meeting — Why Showing Up Matters

The special meeting Archbald scheduled is the kind of proceeding that often gets low attendance but high consequences. Conditional use hearings are legally structured processes where public comment becomes part of the official record. That record can influence the conditions attached to any approval—and those conditions are where community interests get protected or ignored.

Residents who care about traffic patterns, visual impact, noise from cooling equipment, and stormwater runoff have standing to raise those concerns formally. Business owners who want to understand procurement opportunities should be in that room. Local officials who want to negotiate infrastructure improvement commitments from the developer need community backing to do so from a position of strength.

Data center developers are sophisticated negotiators. They do this across dozens of jurisdictions simultaneously. Local communities that show up informed and organized consistently extract better terms than those that simply rubber-stamp applications.

The Bigger Picture for Archbald's Development Trajectory

If this project moves forward, it won't exist in isolation. Major infrastructure investment attracts secondary investment. Fiber providers, energy companies, and logistics operators all follow data center development. The presence of a large, stable commercial tax base makes a municipality more creditworthy and more attractive for other development projects.

Northeastern Pennsylvania has been quietly positioning itself as a viable alternative to saturated data center markets like Northern Virginia, Phoenix, and the Dallas-Fort Worth corridor. Power availability, land costs, proximity to major East Coast population centers, and existing fiber routes all make the region legitimate—not just aspirationally, but competitively.

Archbald's conditional use proceeding is, in that sense, a small but real piece of a much larger infrastructure realignment happening across the country.

The communities that handle these projects well—that ask smart questions, negotiate effectively, invest in complementary infrastructure, and plan for both the construction boom and the operational steady state—are the ones that look back in ten years and say the development genuinely worked for them. The ones that don't end up with a large tax-paying neighbor they don't fully understand and didn't adequately prepare for.

Archbald has the opportunity to be in the first group. The special meeting is step one. What happens in that room, and who shows up to participate in it, will matter more than most residents probably realize right now.

Call to Action: Want to stay updated on the latest developments in the InfraSale Marketplace? Explore our marketplace here!

[INTERNAL LINK: data center investment]

[INTERNAL LINK: economic impact of data centers]

[INTERNAL LINK: community engagement in infrastructure projects]