Why Shawn Milton Supports New Data Center Plans

When a regional energy cooperative president backs a data center proposal, it’s worth paying attention. That's exactly what happened on March 23, when Shawn Milton, President of the Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation (RECC), stepped forward in support of a data center project as the county board voted to table the final conditional zoning decision.

His presence wasn't symbolic; it was strategic.

The Weight Behind Milton's Endorsement

Shawn Milton doesn't attend zoning hearings for minor projects. As the head of RECC, he represents the energy infrastructure backbone that would ultimately power any large-scale data center operation in the region. When he publicly backs a development like this, he's signaling something concrete: the electrical capacity and cooperative support are there.

That kind of institutional alignment — an energy provider publicly supporting a specific development — is exactly what skittish county boards need to see before they approve major infrastructure projects.

His influence on local decisions stems from a practical reality. Data centers are among the most power-hungry facilities built today. A hyperscale facility can consume anywhere from 20 to 100+ megawatts continuously — enough to power tens of thousands of homes. No county board in its right mind approves one without knowing the grid can handle it. Milton's endorsement answers that question before it becomes an obstacle.

Where the Zoning Decision Actually Stands

The county board voted to table the last key conditional zoning approval — which sounds like a setback but often isn't. Tabling a zoning decision is standard procedural practice when boards want additional review time, environmental assessments, or community input before committing. It's a pause, not a rejection.

What matters is that the project reached the final conditional zoning stage at all — that's the finish line, not a roadblock.

Zoning for data center development is notoriously complex. These facilities require specific classifications that account for their industrial power draw, cooling infrastructure, noise considerations from HVAC and backup generators, and often significant water usage for thermal management. Getting a project to the final conditional approval stage means it has already cleared the bulk of that regulatory gauntlet.

The tabling decision simply means stakeholders have more work to do — likely in the form of community meetings, additional technical documentation, or negotiated conditions around operations. That's not unusual; it's the process working as intended.

The Economic Case That's Hard to Ignore

Data centers have become one of the most reliable economic development tools available to rural and mid-tier markets. And the numbers aren't subtle.

A mid-sized data center in the 20-50 MW range typically represents $200 million to $500 million in capital investment during construction alone. Operational jobs tend to be modest in raw headcount — a facility that size might employ 30 to 75 full-time workers — but those positions are high-skill, high-wage roles in network engineering, cybersecurity, and facility management that often pay 40-60% above local median wages.

The broader economic multiplier is where the real story is. Construction phases employ hundreds of local contractors. Local utilities — like RECC — secure long-term, stable load contracts that improve the economics of the entire grid. Property tax revenues from a large data center can run into the millions annually, providing school districts and county governments with durable funding that doesn't fluctuate with commodity cycles or seasonal employment.

For rural counties that have watched manufacturing leave and agricultural margins compress, a data center represents a category of investment that actually gets better over time — facilities expand, infrastructure upgrades compound, and the tax base grows.

This is part of what Milton understands from his seat at RECC. Stable, predictable large-load customers are the holy grail for electric cooperatives. They smooth out demand curves, justify infrastructure investment, and reduce per-unit costs for all ratepayers across the cooperative service area.

Community Reactions: More Complex Than They Appear

Public opinion on data center development rarely breaks down the way outsiders expect. The opposition isn't always anti-growth sentiment — it's often specific, technical concerns that don't get addressed early enough in the process.

Common friction points include water usage (particularly in drought-prone regions), traffic during construction, noise from cooling systems, and — increasingly — questions about whether local residents actually benefit from the jobs created or whether the specialized workforce gets imported. These are legitimate concerns, not NIMBYism.

The communities where data center projects go smoothly are the ones where developers and supporters like Milton engage proactively, not reactively. That means town halls before the zoning hearings, not after. It means publishing specific commitments around local hiring, utility rate impacts, and operational noise levels.

When institutional leaders with genuine community credibility — not just corporate PR teams — make the case publicly, it changes the conversation.

Milton's willingness to appear before the county board suggests the project team understands this dynamic. His endorsement carries a different weight than a developer's own advocacy. He represents ratepayers, not shareholders. That distinction lands differently in a room full of county commissioners.

What Comes Next

The tabled zoning decision will return to the county board. Between now and that vote, the outcome hinges on a few critical factors.

Developers will need to address whatever specific concerns prompted the delay. If those are technical — grid interconnection details, stormwater management, sound attenuation plans — they're solvable with documentation. If they're political — elected officials waiting to see how constituents react — Milton's public support becomes even more valuable as cover for a yes vote.

The broader trend is unambiguous. Demand for data center capacity is accelerating sharply, driven by AI infrastructure buildout, cloud adoption, and enterprise digital transformation. Markets that move quickly on approvals and zoning decisions are capturing investment that slower markets are losing to neighboring states and counties. Every month a project sits tabled is a month developers are evaluating alternatives.

For stakeholders watching this project — neighboring landowners, local contractors, county officials in adjacent jurisdictions — the outcome here will set a precedent. A smooth approval process becomes a competitive differentiator for the region. A prolonged fight becomes a cautionary tale that redirects the next project before it ever files an application.

Milton showed up because he knows which outcome he wants. The question now is whether the county board moves at the speed the market demands.

[INTERNAL LINK: data center benefits]

[INTERNAL LINK: community engagement strategies]

[INTERNAL LINK: economic development opportunities]

Call to Action

Explore more about how data centers can transform your community and drive economic growth by visiting InfraSale Marketplace.