Why a New Data Center in Union County Matters

A data center doesn't announce itself quietly. It arrives with zoning hearings, utility negotiations, and the kind of community meetings where folding chairs fill up fast. That's exactly what's happening in Gregg Township, Union County, Pennsylvania — and if you care about how infrastructure investment shapes smaller communities, this one is worth watching closely.

What's Being Proposed

A developer is moving forward with plans to build a data center in Gregg Township, a rural community in Union County that most people outside central Pennsylvania couldn't place on a map. Details from the initial public meeting announcement are still emerging, but the project has already generated enough attention to put the Williamsport area on notice.

The fact that a developer is targeting a community like Gregg Township — not a major metro suburb, not an established tech corridor — signals something real about where data center development is heading.

Rural and semi-rural sites have become increasingly attractive to operators for a handful of hard-nosed reasons: cheaper land, available acreage for expansion, proximity to fiber routes, and, in some cases, access to cleaner or more affordable power sources. Union County checks enough of those boxes to make the economics pencil out, at least at the planning stage.

A public meeting is being organized to give residents and stakeholders their first structured look at what's being proposed. That meeting matters more than most people realize — it's often the only moment in the development timeline when community input can actually bend the outcome.

The Economic Case — and What's Often Overstated

When a data center developer comes to a small county, the first thing local officials hear is jobs. And there will be jobs — during construction, certainly. A facility of any meaningful scale can generate hundreds of construction positions over 18 to 24 months. That's real money cycling through local restaurants, hardware stores, and hotels.

The permanent employment picture is more nuanced. Modern hyperscale and colocation data centers are not labor-intensive once operational. A large facility might employ 30 to 50 full-time staff on-site — highly skilled technicians, security personnel, and facilities managers — but not the hundreds of ongoing positions that get implied in early community presentations.

What data centers *do* deliver reliably is tax revenue — and that part of the pitch is usually undersold, not oversold.

A substantial data center operation brings significant property tax assessments and, depending on how Pennsylvania's local tax structures apply, potential business privilege and utility tax contributions. For a county like Union, where the municipal budget isn't flush, that kind of stable, long-term revenue stream can matter enormously — funding schools, roads, and emergency services without raising rates on residents.

The smarter economic question for Union County to ask isn't "how many jobs?" It's "what's the 20-year tax impact, and what conditions are we attaching to those benefits?"

The Environmental Equation

Data centers have a complicated relationship with clean energy narratives. On one hand, major operators — Microsoft, Google, Amazon, and others — have made aggressive renewable energy commitments and are actively pushing to site facilities near clean power sources. On the other hand, a single large data center can consume as much electricity as a small city, and that load has to come from somewhere.

For Union County, the environmental considerations break into two categories: energy sourcing and physical site impact.

The energy question hinges on what PPL Electric Utilities or the regional grid can actually deliver, and whether the developer has made any commitments around renewable procurement or on-site generation. These are exactly the kinds of conditions that should be raised — in writing — during the public comment process. A developer who's serious about sustainability will have answers. One who isn't will deflect.

Physical site impact in a township like Gregg involves stormwater management, impervious surface increases, and the potential effect on local water resources. Data centers require substantial cooling infrastructure, and cooling means water. How much, from where, and discharged at what temperature and volume — these aren't abstract concerns in a rural watershed. Local environmental advocates and municipal engineers should be asking for detailed hydrological assessments before any approvals move forward.

The Infrastructure Gap That Nobody Wants to Pay For

Here's the part of data center development that catches communities off guard: the infrastructure gap.

A facility large enough to matter economically will almost certainly require upgrades that the existing local infrastructure wasn't built to handle. We're talking about transmission line capacity, substation upgrades, road reinforcements for heavy construction traffic, and potentially fiber buildout or upgrades if the existing connectivity doesn't meet the operator's requirements.

The critical negotiation isn't about whether these improvements happen — they will — it's about who pays for them and who owns them afterward.

Developers will typically agree to fund infrastructure improvements that directly serve the project, but they'll resist being on the hook for broader community upgrades unless it's written into the approval conditions. This is where municipalities that hire experienced land use attorneys and infrastructure consultants before they get to the negotiating table consistently come out ahead of those that don't.

Union County and Gregg Township should be modeling the long-term maintenance costs of any infrastructure improvements, not just the upfront capital. A newly upgraded road that the township now owns and must maintain is an asset — until it isn't.

Show Up to the Public Meeting

The upcoming public meeting isn't a formality. In the early stages of a development like this, before zoning approvals and DEP permits lock in the project's parameters, community input has genuine leverage.

Residents and stakeholders who want to engage productively should come prepared with specific questions rather than general concerns. What is the total expected power draw of the facility at full build-out? What renewable energy commitments is the developer making, and are they binding? What's the construction timeline and traffic management plan for township roads? What local hiring requirements, if any, are being proposed?

Those aren't hostile questions — they're the questions any serious developer should be ready to answer. If a developer shows up to a public meeting unprepared to address them, that's itself useful information.

Union County commissioners and township supervisors should also be at the table with their own agenda: understanding the full scope of infrastructure requests, reviewing comparable agreements from other Pennsylvania municipalities that have approved similar projects, and identifying which conditions need to be codified in the land development agreement rather than left to a handshake.

Data center development is accelerating across the country, driven by AI compute demand, cloud expansion, and the digitization of nearly every sector of the economy. Smaller communities in states like Pennsylvania are increasingly in the crosshairs — not as afterthoughts, but as deliberate targets. The communities that navigate these projects well aren't the ones that reflexively approve or reject them. They're the ones that do the homework early, ask the right questions at the right time, and negotiate from an informed position.

Union County is at that early moment right now. What happens in the next few public meetings will shape what this project looks like for the next several decades.

Learn more about how you can engage with the InfraSale Marketplace.

[INTERNAL LINK: data center development]

[INTERNAL LINK: community engagement]

[INTERNAL LINK: infrastructure investment]