What's Next for Data Center Development?

The decisions being made in hearing rooms and boardrooms right now will determine whether the next generation of data centers gets built at all — and how.

A recent legal proceeding involving Cornell Realty Management LLC, a data center developer, offers a rare window into the granular complexity hiding behind every major data center project. When an attorney asks an expert witness to describe "the type of system planned," that question carries billions of dollars of implications. The answer shapes permitting timelines, utility negotiations, environmental reviews, and ultimately whether a project breaks ground or dies in committee.

That's the reality of data center development in 2024 and beyond. The demand is undeniable. The obstacles are formidable. And the gap between the two is where fortunes are made or lost.

The Scale of Demand Nobody Fully Prepared For

Power consumption from data centers in the United States is projected to more than double by 2030, according to the Department of Energy. That's not a gradual drift — it's a structural shift driven by AI workloads, cloud migration, and the insatiable appetite of machine learning training runs that consume megawatts the way older server farms consumed kilowatts.

The facilities being designed today aren't just bigger versions of what came before — they're fundamentally different machines that require fundamentally different infrastructure strategies.

A hyperscale campus that would have been considered enormous five years ago — say, 100 MW — is now a mid-size deployment. The largest active campuses operate in the 500 MW to 1+ GW range, and the pipeline of announced projects suggests that threshold will keep climbing. For context, 1 GW is roughly the output of a large nuclear reactor. That's what a single corporate campus might need to power its servers.

This changes everything about site selection, utility coordination, and system design. Which is exactly why the type of system a developer plans matters so much — and why lawyers are asking about it in formal proceedings.

System Design Is Now a Strategic Weapon

When Cornell Realty Management's attorney pressed for specifics on the planned system, the question wasn't technical housekeeping. It was strategic. The system architecture a developer chooses — cooling infrastructure, power delivery topology, backup generation, energy storage integration — determines regulatory exposure, construction timelines, operating costs, and long-term competitiveness.

The industry is splitting into two broad camps right now.

The first camp continues building around traditional air-cooled architectures with incremental efficiency improvements. These projects move faster through permitting because regulators understand them, utilities have modeled their load profiles, and construction teams have built them before. The downside is that air cooling hits physical limits quickly as rack densities climb toward 30, 40, even 100+ kW per rack for AI accelerator clusters.

The second camp is betting on liquid cooling — direct-to-chip, immersion, or rear-door heat exchangers — to handle the thermal loads that AI hardware generates. Liquid cooling can reduce cooling energy consumption by 30 to 40 percent compared to traditional approaches, but it demands different facility designs, different maintenance protocols, and different utility conversations.

Neither approach is universally correct. The right system depends on the workload, the location, the utility's capacity, and the regulatory environment — which is why that deceptively simple question in the Cornell Realty Management proceeding carries so much weight.

Sustainability Has Moved From PR to Procurement Requirement

Five years ago, a data center operator could announce a renewable energy goal and earn favorable press coverage without much near-term accountability. That era is over.

Corporate buyers of cloud services are now embedding sustainability requirements into procurement contracts. Hyperscalers like Google, Microsoft, and Amazon have made public commitments to 24/7 carbon-free energy that require real-time matching of consumption with clean generation — not annual averages. That pressure flows downstream to every developer, colocation operator, and managed service provider in the supply chain.

Sustainable design in data center development now means three concrete things: power usage effectiveness (PUE) targets that actually get enforced, water usage effectiveness (WUE) commitments that account for local watershed stress, and increasingly, integration with battery storage or on-site generation to reduce grid dependency during peak demand.

The insider reality is that water has become the sleeper issue. A large air-cooled data center can consume millions of gallons of water annually for evaporative cooling — a fact that regulators in drought-prone regions are increasingly unwilling to ignore. Developers who site projects without accounting for local water politics are learning expensive lessons.

Projects that incorporate battery energy storage systems (BESS) alongside solar or wind offtake agreements are gaining a distinct advantage in permitting, particularly in markets where grid operators are under pressure to manage peak load. A data center that can dispatch stored energy during grid stress events is a very different conversation with a utility than one that simply demands a new substation.

The Regulatory Gauntlet Is Getting Harder, Not Easier

The Cornell Realty Management proceeding illustrates a broader pattern: data center projects are facing more rigorous regulatory scrutiny than they did even three years ago.

There are legitimate reasons for this. A large data center development can transform a utility's load profile for an entire region. In some markets — Northern Virginia being the most extreme example — data center demand has outpaced transmission capacity to the point where utilities are imposing moratoriums or multi-year interconnection queues. Loudoun County, Virginia, home to the world's highest concentration of data center capacity, has seen projects face years-long delays simply waiting for grid capacity that doesn't exist yet.

The regulatory challenges aren't limited to power. Noise ordinances, traffic impact assessments, stormwater management, setback requirements, and visual impact reviews all add layers of complexity to projects that developers once assumed would sail through on economic development grounds.

The developers who navigate this environment successfully treat regulatory engagement as a design input, not a late-stage checkbox. They're engaging with planning commissions, utility interconnection teams, and environmental agencies during schematic design — not after they've committed to a site and a system architecture that may not survive review.

This is a domain where experienced legal counsel, like the representation Cornell Realty Management has engaged, becomes a genuine competitive advantage. The ability to explain complex system designs in terms that regulators can evaluate — and to anticipate the objections before they're raised — can compress project timelines by months.

Where Capital Is Actually Flowing

Despite the complexity, capital continues to pour into data center development at a pace that suggests the industry's collective judgment is that demand will outrun obstacles.

Private equity firms have moved aggressively into the sector. Real estate investment trusts focused on digital infrastructure — Equinix, Digital Realty, Iron Mountain — have seen their development pipelines expand. And a new wave of independent power producers are positioning battery storage and renewable generation assets specifically to serve data center loads, creating integrated energy-plus-compute campuses that reduce both grid dependency and carbon exposure.

The most interesting deals happening right now are vertical integrations: arrangements where a single entity or consortium controls the land, the power infrastructure, the fiber connectivity, and the compute facilities. This reduces the coordination risk that kills projects in the gap between a developer's ambitions and a utility's capacity planning cycle.

For sellers of industrial land, transmission-adjacent parcels, or existing generation assets, the data center demand wave represents a genuine opportunity — but only if the fundamentals are right. Access to significant power capacity (50 MW minimum for most serious buyers, with preference for 200+ MW sites), fiber proximity, water availability, and a permitting environment that doesn't treat data centers as adversaries are the variables that separate viable sites from wishful thinking.

The Path That Actually Leads Forward

The data center development sector is not in crisis — but it is in a period of genuine stress testing. The projects that get built will be the ones where developers made smart system choices early, engaged regulators as partners rather than obstacles, designed sustainability in rather than bolted it on, and secured the power infrastructure that everything else depends on.

The question an attorney asked about what "type of system" a developer planned for isn't an abstract legal inquiry. It's the question the entire industry is wrestling with at every level, from the engineering team choosing between air and liquid cooling to the board deciding whether to commit capital to a market where interconnection queues run three years deep.

Get the system right, and everything downstream gets easier. Get it wrong, and you'll be answering questions about it in a hearing room — hoping the answers are good enough to keep the project alive.

Explore more about data center development and opportunities in the InfraSale Marketplace.